More Effective Prevention in Occupational Health Practice?
Identifieur interne : 002A30 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 002A29; suivant : 002A31More Effective Prevention in Occupational Health Practice?
Auteurs : R. S. F. Schilling [Royaume-Uni]Source :
- Occupational Medicine [ 0962-7480 ] ; 1984-08.
Abstract
Official figures for occupational disease in the United Kingdom underestimate the true incidence of work-related disease. Successful prevention depends first on identifying risks, either by preliminary testing before anyone is exposed or by observing adverse effects on work people. Methods of identification need to be systematic and more sensitive to detect long term effects and their causes. They can be improved by studying geographical patterns of disease and classifying work by exposures rather than job titles. Incidence and severity of disease are the product of interacting causes, environmental exposures, host factors and individual behaviour—all of which need to be borne in mind if prevention is to be more effective. Occupational health has special opportunities to undertake a wider range of preventive activities which include modification of personal habits. Smoking, diet, physical exercise and control of infection by immunization and screening for non-occupational disease come into this category.
Url:
DOI: 10.1093/occmed/34.3.71
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>More Effective Prevention in Occupational Health Practice?</title><author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Schilling, R S F" sort="Schilling, R S F" uniqKey="Schilling R" first="R. S. F." last="Schilling">R. S. F. Schilling</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:04B6BCD2DA85EB059738F97D07FA7850D21FFC13</idno><date when="1984" year="1984">1984</date><idno type="doi">10.1093/occmed/34.3.71</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/04B6BCD2DA85EB059738F97D07FA7850D21FFC13/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">001993</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">001742</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">002A30</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a">More Effective Prevention in Occupational Health Practice?</title><author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Schilling, R S F" sort="Schilling, R S F" uniqKey="Schilling R" first="R. S. F." last="Schilling">R. S. F. Schilling</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><country>Royaume-Uni</country><placeName><settlement type="city">Londres</settlement><region type="country">Angleterre</region><region type="région" nuts="1">Grand Londres</region></placeName><orgName type="university">Université de Londres</orgName></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Occupational Medicine</title><idno type="ISSN">0962-7480</idno><idno type="eISSN">1471-8405</idno><imprint><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><date type="published" when="1984-08">1984-08</date><biblScope unit="volume">34</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="71">71</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="79">79</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0962-7480</idno></series><idno type="istex">04B6BCD2DA85EB059738F97D07FA7850D21FFC13</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1093/occmed/34.3.71</idno><idno type="ArticleID">34.3.71</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0962-7480</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Official figures for occupational disease in the United Kingdom underestimate the true incidence of work-related disease. Successful prevention depends first on identifying risks, either by preliminary testing before anyone is exposed or by observing adverse effects on work people. Methods of identification need to be systematic and more sensitive to detect long term effects and their causes. They can be improved by studying geographical patterns of disease and classifying work by exposures rather than job titles. Incidence and severity of disease are the product of interacting causes, environmental exposures, host factors and individual behaviour—all of which need to be borne in mind if prevention is to be more effective. Occupational health has special opportunities to undertake a wider range of preventive activities which include modification of personal habits. Smoking, diet, physical exercise and control of infection by immunization and screening for non-occupational disease come into this category.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>Royaume-Uni</li></country><region><li>Angleterre</li><li>Grand Londres</li></region><settlement><li>Londres</li></settlement><orgName><li>Université de Londres</li></orgName></list><tree><country name="Royaume-Uni"><region name="Angleterre"><name sortKey="Schilling, R S F" sort="Schilling, R S F" uniqKey="Schilling R" first="R. S. F." last="Schilling">R. S. F. Schilling</name></region></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sante/explor/ParkinsonV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002A30 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 002A30 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Sante
|area= ParkinsonV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:04B6BCD2DA85EB059738F97D07FA7850D21FFC13
|texte= More Effective Prevention in Occupational Health Practice?
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |